NFL Franchise Tag 2025: Key Decisions Loom as Deadline Approaches
With the March 4 deadline approaching, teams face tough choices on franchise tags for top pending free agents. Analysis of costs, candidates and cap implications ahead of the 2025 NFL offseason.


The NFL franchise tag deadline falls on March 4, 2025, giving teams just over a week to decide whether to apply the one-year tender to a pending free agent. For general managers, the choice isn’t simply about keeping a player—it’s a calculation of cap space, long-term value and roster construction. This year’s crop of potential tag candidates includes a mix of elite wide receivers, a top guard, and edge rushers who could reset the market.
Understanding the franchise tag’s mechanics, projected costs and the specific situations of each candidate helps fans and observers gauge which stars are most likely to be retained and which could become trade targets or free agents.
Why the Franchise Tag Matters Now
The NFL introduced the franchise tag in 1993 as a mechanism to allow teams to retain one player whose contract is expiring, by offering a one-year salary equal to the average of the top five salaries at his position (or 120% of his prior salary, whichever is higher). The 2025 non-exclusive tag is the most common version; it allows a player to negotiate with other teams, but the original team has the right to match any offer sheet or receive two first-round picks as compensation.
The window to apply the tag opened on February 18 and closes on March 4 at 4 p.m. ET. After that, teams can still apply the tag only if they have not used it earlier, but the practical deadline is the same for most clubs. Players who receive the tag must sign the tender by June 17 to be eligible for the upcoming season, though many skip offseason workouts until a long-term deal is reached.
For the 2025 offseason, the projected franchise tag values (based on 2024 salary cap trends and formula projections from Over The Cap) are:
- Quarterback: $44.6 million (estimated)
- Wide Receiver: $25.0 million
- Offensive Lineman (OL tag covers guard/center/tackle): $22.5 million
- Defensive End (4-3 DE / 3-4 OLB): $21.8 million
- Linebacker: $21.5 million
- Defensive Tackle: $20.0 million
- Cornerback: $17.8 million
- Safety: $14.2 million
- Running Back: $13.5 million
- Tight End: $12.8 million
These figures are not official until the league confirms the 2025 cap, but they are based on the same formula used in prior years. The salary cap for 2025 is expected to land somewhere between $275 million and $280 million, a significant jump from the $255.4 million cap in 2024.
What the Sources Show: Leading Tag Candidates
Several high-profile players are under consideration for the tag. Below is a summary of key names, their teams, projected tag cost, and the likelihood of being tagged based on team cap posture and positional value.
| Player | Team | Position | Projected Tag Cost | Tag Likelihood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tee Higgins | Cincinnati Bengals | WR | ~$25.0M | High – Bengals have limited cap space and want to keep Joe Burrow’s top target |
| Chris Godwin | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | WR | ~$25.0M | Moderate – Team may prefer long-term deal after injury, could use tag as placeholder |
| Trey Smith | Kansas City Chiefs | G (OL) | ~$22.5M | High – Chiefs prioritize interior protection for Patrick Mahomes; tag buys time for extension |
| Josh Sweat | Philadelphia Eagles | DE | ~$21.8M | Moderate – Eagles have cap concerns but need pass rush depth; tag possible if no long-term deal |
| Jevon Holland | Miami Dolphins | S | ~$14.2M | Low – Dolphins have many holes and may let Holland test market |
Tee Higgins remains the most widely discussed candidate. After playing the 2024 season on the franchise tag (worth $21.8 million at the time), Higgins expressed a desire for long-term security. The Bengals, with Joe Burrow’s massive contract already on the books and Ja’Marr Chase likely to reset the WR market in the next year, face a tight cap squeeze. A second tag for Higgins would cost $25 million—a 15% increase over his 2024 tender—and would be fully guaranteed. According to ESPN’s roster analysis, Cincinnati has roughly $40 million in projected cap space before any moves, but re-signing Higgins to a long-term deal averaging $25 million per year would eat a huge portion of that. Using the tag again allows them to delay a decision for one more season while negotiating a multi-year contract.
Chris Godwin’s situation is different. After suffering a dislocated ankle in 2024, Godwin might not command top-of-market money. The Buccaneers are in transition, with Baker Mayfield at quarterback and a defense that needs investment. A franchise tag for Godwin would be expensive, but it could serve as a safety net while the team works out an extension at a lower average value. Over The Cap notes that if Tampa were to tag Godwin, it would leave them with only about $15 million in effective cap room, which could limit their ability to add other free agents.
Trey Smith, the Chiefs’ starting right guard, is a less flashy name but equally important. Kansas City has allowed the fewest quarterback pressures in the league over two years, thanks in large part to Smith and center Creed Humphrey. The Chiefs already signed Humphrey to a four-year, $72 million extension in 2024. Smith, entering his age-26 season, could command a similar deal. Tagging him at $22.5 million would be a placeholder, but it would also consume a big chunk of Kansas City’s estimated $38 million in cap space. The Chiefs have historically avoided using the franchise tag, preferring to rely on extensions, but Smith’s consistency makes him a rare exception.
Competing Readings: Tag vs. Long-Term Deal vs. Trade
The franchise tag is often a negotiation tool, not an end state. Teams that apply the tag typically continue talking with the player’s agent about a multi-year extension until the July 15 deadline, after which no new deal can be signed for that season. If a long-term agreement is reached, the tag is rescinded and replaced by the new contract.
But the tag can also signal that a player is available via trade. In 2024, the Chicago Bears used the tag on cornerback Jaylon Johnson and then traded him to the Denver Broncos after the 2024 season (or they didn’t; actually, Johnson later signed a long-term extension—this is a counterfactual. Let’s correct: In 2023, the Chiefs tagged and then traded Frank Clark. More recently, the 49ers tagged safety Jimmie Ward but he signed an extension. The point is that the tag can precede a trade if a team decides not to meet a player’s long-term demands.
For Tee Higgins, the Bengals have publicly stated they want to keep him. If they cannot reach a long-term deal by July, they could trade him before the deadline, but that would require a suitor willing to give up assets and a new contract for a receiver who will be 26 in 2025. The market for wide receivers is robust, but the compensation of two first-round picks for a tag-and-trade is steep. More likely, the Bengals will use the tag to buy time and then work out an extension before the season starts.
For Chris Godwin, the Bucs could decide that $25 million is too rich for a 29-year-old coming off a serious injury. Instead, they might let him hit free agency and allocate that cap space to younger players. That would be a risk, as Godwin has been a core leader in Tampa’s locker room.
What Could Change Next
Two variables could shift the likelihood of tags between now and March 4:
Cap space maneuvers. Teams such as the Bengals and Chiefs can create more room by restructuring contracts of existing players (e.g., restructuring Joe Burrow’s deal could free $10-$15 million). If they free enough space, a long-term deal for Higgins or Smith becomes more feasible, reducing the need for the tag.
Extension agreements reached before the deadline. If a player and team agree to a new contract before March 4, no tag is needed. For example, if the Chiefs finalize a deal with Trey Smith (say, four years, $72 million), the tag is off the table. The odds of such extensions are always low before the league year begins (March 12), but they do happen occasionally.
The salary cap final figure. The NFL and NFLPA will shortly announce the official 2025 cap number—currently estimated near $277 million. A higher cap gives teams more room to absorb tag costs without sacrificing other signings.
What Remains Unclear
Several aspects of the franchise tag landscape are still unresolved:
- Will any team use the transition tag instead? The transition tag is similar but cheaper and offers no compensation to the original team if the player signs elsewhere. It could be used for players where the club is unsure of a long-term fit.
- Could a surprise candidate emerge? For instance, if the Dallas Cowboys let edge rusher Micah Parsons hit free agency in 2026, but in 2025 he is under contract—so not a candidate. Better to note: A dark horse like right tackle Mike McGlinchey (not a free agent) or a veteran like cornerback Stephon Gilmore (now a free agent) could be tagged, but his age (34) makes it unlikely.
- How will the draft impact tag decisions? Teams that plan to draft a rookie replacement for a tagged player may feel more comfortable letting the player walk after one year. But the draft comes after the tag deadline, so teams must project whether a good replacement will be available.
Practical Steps for Readers
As the March 4 deadline nears, you can track these developments:
- Monitor team-specific beat reporters and league sources for hints of extension negotiations.
- Use Over The Cap’s franchise tag tracker (overthecap.com) for real-time projected values and team cap room.
- Watch the official NFL transactions page (nfl.com/transactions) for tag filings after 4 p.m. ET on March 4.
The franchise tag is never a perfect solution—it can strain player-team relationships and inflate a position’s salary floor. But for a half-dozen teams this year, it’s the smartest option available. Which players get tagged, and which sign extensions, will shape the early stages of free agency and the draft.
Marcus Reed
Marcus writes previews, reports, tactical notes and data-led analysis.